Dispute Resolution Services in New York and New Jersey

Legal disputes don’t always have to end in a courtroom. At the Law Offices of Rudy A. Dermesropian, we offer dispute resolution services designed to resolve conflicts efficiently and amicably. Serving clients across New York and New Jersey, we provide strategic guidance for mediation, arbitration, and negotiation to help individuals and businesses find fair and timely solutions without the stress and expense of litigation.

A woman is standing in the snow holding skis.

Resolving Conflicts Outside the Courtroom

What Is Dispute Resolution?

Dispute resolution refers to alternative methods of settling legal conflicts outside of traditional litigation. These methods, including mediation and arbitration, allow parties to reach agreements through collaborative dialogue or binding decisions. Our firm focuses on understanding the unique aspects of your case and crafting strategies that help you achieve your desired outcome while preserving important relationships and minimizing costs.

01

Mediation: Collaborative Problem Solving

Mediation is a voluntary process where a neutral third party helps disputing parties reach a mutually agreeable solution. We provide expert guidance during mediation sessions, ensuring your interests are represented while fostering open communication and creative problem-solving.


02

Arbitration: A Binding Resolution

Arbitration offers a more formal approach to dispute resolution without the need for a courtroom. Our firm represents clients in arbitration proceedings, presenting persuasive arguments to arbitrators who make binding decisions. This process is often faster and more cost-effective than traditional litigation.


03

Negotiation: Reaching Agreements Efficiently

Sometimes, a direct negotiation between parties is the best path forward. We act as skilled negotiators, working to resolve conflicts while protecting your interests. Our goal is to help you reach agreements that meet your objectives quickly and effectively.


A man is sitting at a table holding a glass of wine.

Efficient Solutions for Complex Conflicts

Why Choose the Law Offices of Rudy A. Dermesropian?

We understand that not every dispute requires litigation. Our firm is committed to helping clients resolve conflicts through alternative means, saving time and resources while achieving meaningful results. With personalized attention and strategic thinking, we ensure your voice is heard and your goals are prioritized.

Dispute Resolution FAQs

  • What is alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in law?

    lternative dispute resolution (ADR) refers to any method of resolving legal disputes without going through a traditional court trial. The two most common forms of ADR are mediation and arbitration, but other methods include negotiation and conciliation. In ADR, the goal is to reach a fair resolution more efficiently and amicably than might occur in a courtroom battle. For example:


    - In mediation, a neutral third party called a mediator helps facilitate a discussion between the parties to find common ground. The mediator doesn’t decide the case but guides the parties toward a mutually agreeable solution.


    - In arbitration, one or more neutral arbitrators (often experienced attorneys or retired judges) act somewhat like a private judge. They listen to each side’s evidence and arguments and then make a binding decision (an “award”). Arbitration is usually less formal than court but more structured than mediation.


    ADR is often faster, less formal, and more cost-effective than litigation. It also allows for privacy (since court filings are public) and can preserve relationships by being less adversarial. Our firm offers dispute resolution services in addition to litigation, helping clients in New York and New Jersey find efficient solutions through methods like mediation and arbitration when appropriate.


  • What is the difference between mediation and arbitration?

    Both mediation and arbitration are forms of alternative dispute resolution, but they work very differently:


    - Mediation is a collaborative process. The mediator does not have power to impose a decision. Instead, the mediator facilitates communication, helps clarify issues, and explores settlement options. Any agreement comes from the parties themselves – meaning both sides must agree to the outcome. Mediation sessions are confidential and informal. If the parties can’t reach an agreement, they can still go to court later, since mediation is non-binding.

     

    - Arbitration is more like a private trial. The arbitrator (or panel of arbitrators) acts as a decision-maker. Each side presents evidence and arguments, though typically the process is less formal than court (for example, rules of evidence might be relaxed). After hearing both sides, the arbitrator issues a decision which is usually binding and enforceable in court, much like a judgment. Importantly, there’s very limited opportunity to appeal an arbitrator’s decision – it’s generally final.


    In summary, mediation = guided negotiation with no imposed outcome (only mutual agreement), and arbitration = private adjudication with a binding decision. The choice between mediation and arbitration depends on how much control the parties want over the outcome and whether they are willing to accept an arbitrator’s decision as final. Sometimes contracts specify that disputes must go to one or the other. Our firm can advise which approach may be best for your situation or represent you through either process.

  • Why choose mediation or arbitration instead of going to court?

    There are several advantages to choosing mediation or arbitration (ADR) over traditional litigation:


    - Time and Efficiency: Court cases can drag on for months or years due to backlogged court calendars and lengthy procedures. Mediation and arbitration are usually much faster. A mediation might resolve a dispute in a day or two of sessions. An arbitration hearing can often be scheduled sooner than a court trial and concluded more quickly.


    - Cost Savings: Because ADR processes are faster and have simpler procedures, they often cost less in legal fees and expenses. There’s less courtroom procedure, and in mediation, if you settle, you avoid the costs of a prolonged fight entirely. Arbitration can also be cheaper than court, though if the case is very complex the cost savings might be less pronounced (and note, arbitrators do charge fees for their time).


    - Privacy: ADR is private. Court cases are generally public record, which means sensitive business information or personal matters become public. Mediation discussions are confidential, and arbitration proceedings and results can be kept private by agreement. This is a big benefit for companies concerned about public image or individuals who value discretion.


    - Control and Flexibility: In mediation, parties have a lot of control over the outcome since they craft the agreement. Even in arbitration, parties often have a say in selecting the arbitrator or setting some rules for how the process will go. The procedures can be more flexible than rigid court rules.


    - Preserving Relationships: Mediation, being collaborative, can reduce bitterness and preserve business or personal relationships. It’s often used when parties need to continue interacting (like business partners or family) because it’s less adversarial. Arbitration is adversarial, but generally more cordial and streamlined than a court trial, which might also help maintain a working relationship.


    Of course, ADR is not always appropriate – for example, if one side is completely uncooperative or you need an immediate court order (injunction) to stop something harmful. However, in many cases, trying mediation or arbitration first can save time, money, and stress. We often help our clients in New York and New Jersey explore these alternatives, and only proceed to litigation if necessary.

  • Can I be required to go to arbitration instead of filing a lawsuit?

    Often, yes – if you’ve signed a contract that includes an arbitration clause, you may be obligated to resolve certain disputes through arbitration rather than in court. Many businesses include arbitration agreements in their contracts (for example, in consumer service agreements, employment contracts, or partnership agreements). These clauses typically state that any disputes arising under the contract must be submitted to binding arbitration and not to a lawsuit in court.


    When such a clause exists and is enforceable, courts will usually compel arbitration, meaning you cannot pursue the claim in court (apart from limited exceptions, like if the clause is found to be unconscionable or not applicable to the dispute at hand). For instance, if you have a contract with a vendor or an employee agreement in New York that mandates arbitration, and a dispute arises, the first step is to initiate the arbitration process according to that agreement’s rules (often under organizations like the American Arbitration Association).


    It’s important to have a lawyer review contracts before you sign them so you understand if you’re giving up the right to a court trial. If you’re already in a dispute and discover an arbitration clause, an attorney can advise on its enforceability and guide you through the arbitration process. Our firm can assist with arbitration proceedings, ensuring that even outside of court, your case is presented effectively and your rights are protected during arbitration.

  • Do I need a lawyer for mediation or arbitration?

    While mediation and arbitration are more informal than court, it’s still very beneficial to have a lawyer represent or advise you:


    - In mediation, a lawyer can help you prepare by clarifying your goals and identifying your strongest points. They can attend the mediation with you, helping to communicate your position effectively and negotiate on your behalf. If you reach a settlement, your attorney will ensure the agreement is written correctly and protects your interests. Even though mediation is cooperative, having legal guidance prevents you from inadvertently giving up important rights or agreeing to unfavorable terms.


    - In arbitration, it’s highly recommended to have a lawyer. Arbitration is essentially a private trial, and the rules of evidence and procedure, while relaxed, still apply to some degree. An experienced attorney will present evidence, make legal arguments, and handle witness examination during the arbitration hearing. Remember, arbitration decisions are binding and there are very limited grounds to appeal, so you want to put on the best case possible the first time.


    Additionally, a lawyer familiar with ADR can advise you on choosing a good mediator or arbitrator, and on strategy (for example, whether to agree to certain arbitration rules or to push for mediation first). In summary, having a lawyer in mediation or arbitration can significantly improve your chances of a favorable outcome, just as in court. Our attorneys regularly assist clients in alternative dispute resolution proceedings to help achieve fair results efficiently.

Resolve Your Disputes Quickly and Fairly

If you’re facing a legal conflict, let us help you explore alternative dispute resolution methods. Contact the Law Offices of Rudy A. Dermesropian today to schedule your consultation and take the first step toward a fair and efficient resolution.